Coyne, J.C., and you can D.A. Smith. 1994. Partners coping with myocardial infarction: Contextual angle towards patient care about-effectiveness. Log out-of Members of the family Mindset 8:1-thirteen.
Fincham, F.D., T.Letter. Bradbury, and you may C.K. Scott. 1990. Knowledge during the and you may T. N. Bradbury, eds. The fresh new psychology away from relationships. Ny: Guilford Drive.
Gottman, J.Yards. 1993. This new positions away from argument engagement, escalation, and you may reduction from inside the relationship communication: A good longitudinal view of four particular couples. Log of Asking and you may Health-related Mindset 61(1):6-fifteen.
Gottman, J.Meters., S. Carrere, C. Swanson and J. Coan. 2000. Answer “Off preliminary research in order to input.” Journal from ily 62(1):265-273.
Gottman, J.Meters., J. Coan, S. Carrere, and you can C. Swanson. 1998. Forecasting relationship delight and you will balances regarding newlywed connections. Record out-of ily sixty(1):5-twenty-two.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., and you will N. S. Jacobson. 1985. Causal attributions off married couples: Whenever carry out it identify explanations? Precisely what do they end once they do? Log out-of Character and you can Public Therapy -1412.
Kendall, S., and D. Tannen. 2001. Discourse and you can Intercourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and you can H. Hamilton, eds. The latest Manual sudy profiles regarding Commentary Analysis. 548-567. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Editors.
Lerner, H. 2002. This new dance out of partnership: How-to correspond with some body while you are angry, harm, terrified, angry, insulted, deceived otherwise desperate. Nyc: HarperCollins Publishers.
Stanley, S., T. Bradbury, and H. . Architectural flaws in the connection off preliminary research towards the relationship in order to input for couples. Journal regarding ily 62(1):256-264.
Cite this article
Wiley, Angela R. 2007. Connecting as the a couple: Communication knowledge for healthy matchmaking. The latest Discussion board to have Members of the family and you can Individual Situations, a dozen (1).
A beneficial communications and you may problem-solving experiences try crucial for relationship profits; but not, fit matchmaking need way more than just good communications and disease-resolving skills. Discover a common more-reliance upon such as the “regal road to love and an enduring, happy matrimony”(Gottman and you may Gold 1999, 8). These feel are very important yet not adequate having good dating and you will is contextualized included in the larger couples program. (Having details about almost every other key methods in order to strengthening and keeping a suit relationships, comprehend the Federal Extension Relationships and Relationships Education Design,
In her own book, The fresh new Dancing from Relationship, practitioner Harriet Lerner (2002) discusses which have an authentic sound in the very important intimate matchmaking. She contends one a crucial part of having an authentic voice try “openly shar[ing] skills as well as problems and vulnerability (Lerner 2002, 3). The woman long-title clinical practice shows that it is intimate interaction requires people fully playing one another and you will asking making clear concerns that enable them to learn both further. Effortlessly intimate couples are also ready state their own emotions and you can view, even if those people change from the partner’s.
Bad perceptions. Negative translation patterns tend to can be found whenever partners believe brand new poor instead of the finest regarding both (Fincham, Bradbury, and you may Scott, 1990; Holtzworth-Munroe and Jacobson 1985). Such as for example couples are definitely more maybe not “keeping it confident.” They might participate in a crude begin-upwards bid centered on a negative interpretation or expectation. They might turn facing otherwise off the mate when responding so you can a bid. Partners who will be more likely to bad interpretations might as an alternative try funny a confident reason behind brand new other people’s practices and you may sharing them with the spouse. Such as for example, unlike, “You probably did maybe not sign up for the fresh new rubbish because you should build me mad,” Jim you’ll say to their girlfriend, Peg, “I know you didn’t take out the garbage because you envision I would personally have significantly more to increase the fresh new can.”
Love, P
Coan, J., J. Gottman, J. Babcock, and you may Letter. Jacobson. 1997. Battering therefore the men rejection out-of infiuence out-of people. Aggressive Behavior -388.